The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday, June 26, 2017 in the case of Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius that closely-held corporations can refuse to provide contraception coverage to their employees if it violates the owners’ religious beliefs.
The 5-4 ruling means that companies like Hobby Lobby, a chain of arts-and-craft stores, can exclude birth control from the insurance coverage they offer employees.
The court’s conservative majority, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, said that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 protects closely-held corporations from the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act.
The contraception mandate requires that employer-provided health insurance plans cover a range of preventive services, including contraception.
Hobby Lobby and other businesses challenging the mandate said they should not be forced to provide coverage that violates their religious beliefs.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her dissent, said the ruling endangers women’s health.
“In the Court’s view, RFRA demands accommodation of a for-profit corporation’s religious beliefs no matter the impact that accommodation may have on third parties who do not share the corporation owners’ religious faith — including employees,” Ginsburg wrote.
She was joined in her dissent by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
The ruling applies to closely-held corporations, those that are not publicly traded and have a limited number of shareholders.
The contraception mandate was one of the most controversial provisions of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.
The law requires most Americans to have health insurance and imposes a fine on those who do not.
The contraception mandate was aimed at ensuring that women have access to contraception, which is used by some women to prevent pregnancy.
Supporters of the contraception mandate said it was necessary to ensure that women have access to contraception.
Opponents of the mandate said it violated the religious freedom of business owners.
The case was argued before the Supreme Court in March 2014.
The Supreme Court heard two other cases challenging the contraception mandate, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell, in March 2014.
The cases are part of a broader challenge to the Affordable Care Act.
The Affordable Care Act was passed by Congress in 2010 and signed into law by President Barack Obama.
The law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling in June 2012.
The Affordable Care Act requires most Americans to have health insurance and imposes a fine on those who do not.
The contraception mandate was aimed at ensuring that women have access to contraception.
Opponents of the mandate said it violated the religious freedom of business owners.
The Affordable Care Act was passed by Congress in 2010 and signed into law by President Barack Obama.
The law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling in June 2012.
Contents
What is the proper legal citation for Burwell v Hobby Lobby?
Burwell v Hobby Lobby is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) protects closely held for-profit corporations from the requirement to provide their employees with contraceptive coverage.
The Court’s opinion was written by Justice Samuel Alito and was joined by the Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.
The Court’s decision reversed the Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling, which had found that the RFRA did not prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from requiring that employers provide their employees with contraceptive coverage.
The legal citation for Burwell v Hobby Lobby is: 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014).
Why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of Hobby Lobby in Burwell v Hobby Lobby?
The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Burwell v Hobby Lobby case was a 5-4 decision in favor of the craft chain store. The case revolved around the question of whether for-profit companies could be exempt from the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate if the owners had religious objections.
In his majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the contraceptive mandate violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) because it placed a substantial burden on the religious beliefs of the company’s owners. The ruling means that Hobby Lobby and other for-profit companies can refuse to provide contraception coverage to their employees if they have religious objections.
The ruling was met with criticism from many who felt that it gave employers too much power to impose their religious beliefs on their employees. However, supporters of the ruling argue that it protects the religious freedom of all Americans.
Did Hobby Lobby win Supreme Court case?
On June 30, 2014, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby that closely held for-profit corporations could not be required to provide contraception coverage for their employees if it violated the religious beliefs of the company’s owners. The 5-4 decision was seen as a major victory for religious conservatives, who argued that the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate violated the religious freedom of business owners.
The case began in 2012, when Hobby Lobby, a chain of craft stores, sued the Obama administration over the contraception mandate. Hobby Lobby’s owners, the Green family, argued that providing contraception coverage to their employees violated their religious beliefs. The Obama administration argued that the contraception mandate was a necessary part of the Affordable Care Act, and that it was not possible to exempt religious business owners from the requirement.
In March 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby, stating that the contraception mandate violated the religious freedom of business owners. The Obama administration appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court.
On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its 5-4 decision in favor of Hobby Lobby. In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the contraception mandate violated the religious freedom of business owners, and that the government could not require business owners to violate their religious beliefs. The dissenting opinion, written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, argued that the contraception mandate was a necessary part of the Affordable Care Act.
The Hobby Lobby case was seen as a major victory for religious conservatives, who argued that the contraception mandate violated the religious freedom of business owners. The case also demonstrated the importance of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was passed in 1993 and prohibits the government from burdening the religious freedom of individuals and business owners.
When was the Hobby Lobby case?
On March 25, 2014, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Hobby Lobby case. The case revolved around whether or not the craft chain store could be required to provide insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act.
On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case. The Court ruled that Hobby Lobby and other closely-held corporations could not be required to provide insurance coverage for contraception, because it violated the corporations’ religious beliefs.
Is Hobby Lobby owned by the Mormon Church?
Hobby Lobby, the popular arts and crafts chain, has been in the news a lot lately. First, there was the Supreme Court case that determined that the company could refuse to provide contraception coverage to its employees on religious grounds. More recently, it’s been revealed that the company’s owners are planning to build a Museum of the Bible in Washington, D.C.
So, is Hobby Lobby owned by the Mormon Church?
The answer is no. While the company’s owners are devout Christians, they are not affiliated with the Mormon Church.
However, the Museum of the Bible is being funded in part by the Mormon Church. In fact, the Church is the largest financial backer of the museum.
The Museum of the Bible is set to open in November 2017. It will be the largest privately-funded museum in the United States.
Who is the plaintiff in Burwell v Hobby Lobby?
The plaintiff in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case is Hobby Lobby, a crafts chain store. The company is represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit organization that advocates for religious freedom. The Becket Fund argues that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate violates the religious freedom of Hobby Lobby and its owners, the Green family.
Is Hobby Lobby Against birth control?
Hobby Lobby is a chain of craft stores, owned by a conservative Christian family. In 2014, they made headlines when they successfully argued in front of the Supreme Court that they should be exempt from providing contraception coverage to their employees, on the grounds of religious freedom.
This caused a lot of debate, with people on both sides arguing about whether or not Hobby Lobby was against birth control.
The company has never made a secret of their religious beliefs, and they have always been opposed to birth control. They believe that it is a sin, and that it should not be used for contraception.
However, they have never said that they are against it being used for other purposes, such as treating medical conditions.
Hobby Lobby is not the only company to oppose birth control. There are many religious groups who believe that contraception is wrong, and they have the right to express that view.
However, Hobby Lobby is the only company to take it to the Supreme Court in order to get an exemption from providing coverage.
This has caused a lot of people to accuse Hobby Lobby of being against birth control. However, it is important to remember that they have never said that they are against it being used for any purpose.
